Which of the following statements is true regarding state certification for pesticide applicators?

State certification for pesticide applicators is a crucial requirement designed to ensure that individuals handling pesticides are knowledgeable about the safe use and potential risks associated with these chemicals. The statement that applicators of all pesticides or their supervisors must have state certification reflects the regulatory framework that governs pesticide applications. It emphasizes the importance of having trained professionals who understand the applicable laws, safety procedures, and environmental considerations when using pesticides.

This requirement applies universally to the application of both restricted-use and general-use pesticides, reinforcing the obligation to implement best practices and to protect public health and the environment. Those who supervise pesticide applicators must also be certified to ensure that they are capable of guiding and overseeing those who are applying pesticides, thereby ensuring compliance with regulatory standards.

In contrast, other statements present scenarios that do not align with the regulatory requirements pertaining to pesticide applications. For instance, the idea that pesticide applicators can work without certification if they are supervised undermines the necessity for both the supervisor and the applicator to be certified, which is essential for accountability and adherence to safety standards. Additionally, restricting the requirement to only private applicators overlooks the fact that all commercial applicators also must be certified. Lastly, the claim that all pesticide products are exempt from registration is inaccurate as all pesticides sold in